Citat:
|
Originalno napisao Dejan Bizinger
Da li si ti siguran za to? Da li imas neki zvanicni dokument ili sajt koji to potvrdjuje? Ja se sa tim ne slazem. SAD su uvele CAN-SPAM zakon koji jasno nalaze email izdavacima da nikog ne mogu staviti bez njegove/njene dozvole na listu, da ako nude checkboxove za prijavu na vise email casopisa da oni ne smeju da budu unapred "stiklirani", da mail sadrzi opt-out link, da stave svoju fizicku adresu u mail i jos mnogo drugih stvari.
Mnogi kada dobiju SPAM nece da kliknu na opt-out link jer je to zapravo jedna od glavnih fora spamera da vide da je rec o pravoj email adresi.
|
Slazem se, i nisam ja neki expert, znaci mozda sam pogresno shvatio, ali evo sta pise:
Citat:
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108-187, S. 877)
The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act requires unsolicited commercial e-mail messages to be labeled (though not by a standard method) and to include opt-out instructions and the sender's physical address. It prohibits the use of deceptive subject lines and false headers in such messages. The FTC is authorized (but not required) to establish a "do-not-email" registry. State laws that require labels on unsolicited commercial e-mail or prohibit such messages entirely are pre-empted, although provisions merely addressing falsity and deception would remain in place. The CAN-SPAM Act took effect on January 1, 2004.
|
ceo text :
http://www.spamlaws.com/federal/summ108.shtml#s877
Koliko ja vidim iz ovoga nigde se ne kaze da moras da se slozis da budes emailovan, niti se kontrolise kako je oglasavac dosao do tvoje adrese. Ovo je doduse federalni zakon, a neke drzave imaju ostrije propise.