Ono sto sam pominjao za Kaliforniju:
Citat:
|
Section 2870 of the California Labor Code “(a) Any provision in an employment agreement which provides that an employee shall assign, or offer to assign, any of his or her rights in an invention to his or her employer shall not apply to an invention that the employee developed entirely on his or her own time without using the employer’s equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information except for those inventions that either: (1) relate at the time of conception or reduction to practice of the invention to the employer’s business, or actual or demonstrably anticipated research or development of the employer and (2) result from any work performed by the employee for the employer. (b) To the extent a provision in an employment agreement purports to require an employee to assign an invention otherwise excluded from being required to be assigned under subdivision (a), the provision is against the public policy of this state and is unenforceable."
|
Inace sad ne mogu da nadjem tu diskusuju, cini mi se na Quori, gde se o ovome pricalo, i ljudi su se zalili da advokati firmi masovno pokusavaju da proguraju ovakve sveobuhvatne ugovore, jer je njima tako naprosto najjednostavnije. Ali naravno za tango treba dvoje, i po meni na ovakve stvari jednostavno ne treba pristajati. Sigurno vredis firmi dovoljno da te nece tek tako otpustiti, nego ce se pokusati dogovoriti nesto, dok god je to sto trazis razumno... ako ne onda ce ti biti bolje u drugoj firmi, sigurno, jer ocigledno postoje neki veci problemi u odnosima od copyrighta...