|
Web aplikacije, web servisi i software Frameworks, web servisi, programi, plugin-ovi, ekstenzije korisni za razvoj web sajtova. Sponzor: |
|
Alati teme | Način prikaza |
|
11. 06. 2009. | #1 |
old school
Expert
Datum učlanjenja: 14.10.2006
Poruke: 460
Hvala: 39
17 "Hvala" u 14 poruka
|
Ja sam exportovao mailing listu, sa find and replace zamenio eunet, sezam i poznate isp-ove, a ostalo isao peske. Proveravao koji je novi domen i onda radio zamenu.
za 2000 mailova i nije bilo tako strasno |
11. 06. 2009. | #2 |
Goran Pilipović
Sir Write-a-Lot
|
Kod email adrese je dobro to sto je automatski unique (osim ako vec nisi registrovan ili si stavio pogresan email). Kada pokusavas da se registrujes sa username, bar meni se cesto desi da mi prijavi kako "username already exists" a nemam pojma da li sam se ja to nekada davno registrovao pa zaboravio na to (i da li da pokusavam "reset password") ili je to neki tudji account.
Takodje, kada je recimo forum u pitanju, i neko vidi neki nick "pera12345" moze da pokusava da se loguje na njegov account, zna mu username, samo da jos pogodi password. A posto znamo da ljudi cesto koriste passworde koji se lako pogadjaju - nekom upornom ne bi bilo tesko da se uloguje umesto "pera12345". Ali, ako se pera12345 loguje sa email-om, onda taj "uporni" mora ne samo da pogodi password nego da zna i njegov tacan email, sto je teze, narocito ako se ne poznaju. Ja sam za login preko email-a, a ako hocete prebacicemo tu pricu u novu temu.
__________________
Goran Pilipović a.k.a. Ugly Fingers Bradley f.k.a. bluesman I don't always know what I'm talking about but I know I'm right! |
"Hvala" bluesman za poruku: |
11. 06. 2009. | #3 |
Slobodan Marković
Qualified
|
@zira
RNIDS je poslao Google samo DNS zone za aktivne .yu i .rs domene, a Google je onda radio "svoju magiju" sa tim podacima, tako da taj slučaj nije primenljiv na ovu situaciju. Što se tiče email adresa i tranzicije, moram da priznam da sam i ja u velikom problemu sa tim (zbog velike Internodium liste i još nekoliko mailing lista koje održavam), ali čini mi se da su jedine mogućnosti: 1. pozvati korisnike da sami promene svoje adrese 2. promeniti sve postojeće .yu adresu u .rs sa search&replace 3. ako poruke krenu da se vraćaju posle prethodne akcije, proveriti ručno (whois, web sajt) da li je korisnik možda prešao sa .co.yu direktno na .rs domen Pozdrav, Sloba |
"Hvala" smarkovic za poruku: |
11. 06. 2009. | #4 |
Super Moderator
Knowledge base
Datum učlanjenja: 02.10.2006
Lokacija: Niš
Poruke: 1.618
Hvala: 263
275 "Hvala" u 104 poruka
|
jel mogu da pitam ovde - ko je odredio rok da se .yu ugasi ovako rano?
kazem rano jer negde procitah da je SSSR-ov TLD bio aktivan vise od jedne decenije [a mozda je i jos aktivan?] i ima li ikakvih sansi da se taj rok prolongira? |
"Hvala" Peca za poruku: |
11. 06. 2009. | #5 |
expert
Expert
Datum učlanjenja: 14.11.2008
Lokacija: Srbija
Poruke: 539
Hvala: 142
129 "Hvala" u 67 poruka
|
Poslednja izmena od Markok : 11. 06. 2009. u 21:39. |
12. 06. 2009. | #6 |
Moderator
Expert
|
Ja kad vidim da se nekome bouncuje mail, pozovem ga
ps. Mozda poslati svima mail da dok jos mogu, da ga zamene? ps. .yu ce da radi barem do 2010... |
12. 06. 2009. | #7 | |
Vladimir Aleksić
Certified
Datum učlanjenja: 10.07.2006
Poruke: 93
Hvala: 0
13 "Hvala" u 11 poruka
|
Citat:
Minutes for Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors 11 September 2007 Delegation of the .ME ( Montenegro) Domain Delegation of the .RS ( Serbia) Domain Redelegation of the .YU (former Yugoslavia) Domain Kim Davies advised that the delegation of .ME ( Montenegro) and .RS ( Serbia) and the redelegation of .YU ( Yugoslavia) were interrelated. At the time that Serbia and Montenegro became new countries, the ISO 3166-1list was altered to give the two countries individual codes .RS and .ME respectively. To date, the countries covered have been using the .YU domain. The YU code is no longer in the ISO 3166-1 list and has been replaced with .ME and .RS and as such should be decommissioned in a responsible way. The transition plan from .YU to .RS and .ME involves an MOU between the two entities and would see that .YU is assigned to the proposed .RS sponsoring organization, which is effectively the same operator as today. They would act as caretaker for .YU for two years to allow for a stable transition. ICANN’s proposed resolution language is consistent with this plan however a three-year transition period is proposed to allow for contingencies. The proposed resolutions support the two new delegations and acknowledge the two parties involved in de-commissioning of the .YU domain, and state it is to be retired in three years time. In addition to explaining the ICANN evaluation of the delegation applications, the board was also advised of last-minute correspondence IANA had received in relation to the delegation of the .ME domain. Steve Goldstein asked if there is any provision in the agreement to restrict new registrations in .YU. Kim Davies advised that he would have to check to be certain, but as soon as new registrations are allowed in .RS and .ME it was his understanding that it would not be possible to register new domains in .YU. Steve Goldstein asked why the preference for a three-year transition rather than two. Kim Davies advised they didn’t want to propose something that was too aggressive. The applicants had proposed a two-year transition period, but the Board could consider a different length. The Chair proposed that the language in the resolution could be changed to be up to and no more than three years. Steve Crocker acknowledged that some transitions have taken a long time. An additional suggestion would be to ask for regular reports with metrics measuring progress towards the outcome. Kim Davies noted that the resolution proposed does suggest that the .YU registry report every 6 months to ICANN Staff on progress. The proposed resolution also makes it clear the domain must be removed no later than 2010, which was considered a responsible timeframe that was neither too aggressive, nor unnecessarily prolonged. If the community felt it could transition quicker there is nothing to stop that from happening. Paul Twomey suggested that the wording be slightly amended asking that they report progress against appropriate metrics. There were no objections to the suggested amendments. Dave Wodelet asked if it mattered if they take till 2008, 2009 or even 2010 and the Chair responded that we do want a certain end date. Kim Davies advised that there is no strong precedent for how long transition will take from one to the other. There have only been a small number of transitions of country codes in the history of ccTLDs. In trying to determine what they considered a reasonable timeframe for transition the closest comparable situation that IANA was aware of is when telephone-numbering systems change. These transitions generally take place in one-to-two years. The Chair noted that the language proposed by Paul Twomey seems acceptable, an alternative to an extra year would be to stick with two years to 2009 and if the party needs more time they could come back and explain why, which may be the best option. Putting in a two-year timeframe provides them with leverage to help their community to promptly perform the transition. The Chair recommended the alternative on the basis it was made clear to them that if they have a problem with two years they can come back with an explanation to ICANN as to why they need more time. Susan Crawford noted that she understands the direction and appreciates the conservative approach, but asked what mechanism should be used if the transition moves too slowly. The Chair reflected that if they come back and have a reasonable explanation, then this should be okay. He believed you would help them with a shorter deadline as they can point to that as a mandate to move ahead and transition to other the domain. Janis Karklins noted that human nature suggests they will take as much time as they are given for transitioning. He suggested that the resolution should include a point that ICANN Staff should keep the Board informed of the progress of the transition. In summation, the Chair suggested that the Board approves all three requests, and that ICANN Staff is expected to keep the Board informed on the retirement of .YU domain. Paul Twomey added that they communicate according to appropriate metrics. Steve Goldstein moved and Vanda Scartezini seconded the following resolution: Delegation of .ME Whereas, the .ME top-level domain is the designated country-code for Montenegro , Whereas, ICANN has received a request for delegation of .ME to the Government of Montenegro, Whereas, ICANN has reviewed the request, and has determined that the proposed delegation would be in the best interest of the local and global Internet communities, Resolved (07.75), that the proposed delegation of the .ME domain to the Government of Montenegro is approved. Delegation of .RS Whereas, the .RS top-level domain is the designated country-code for Serbia, Whereas, ICANN has received a request for delegation of .RS to the Serbian National Register of Internet Domain Names, Whereas, ICANN has reviewed the request, and has determined that the proposed delegation would be in the best interest of the local and global Internet communities, Resolved (07.76), that the proposed delegation of the .RS domain to the Serbian National Register of Internet Domain Names is approved. Redelegation of .YU Whereas, the .YU top-level domain is currently used by the citizens of both Serbia and Montenegro, Whereas, ICANN has delegated the .RS domain for use in Serbia, and the .ME domain for use in Montenegro, Whereas, the ISO 3166-1 standard has removed the “YU” code, and the ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency recommends its use be discontinued, Whereas, ICANN is not responsible for deciding what is or is not a country, and adheres to the ISO 3166-1 standard for guidance on when to add, modify and remove country-code top-level domains, Whereas, there is a transition plan to move registrations in .YU to the new domains .RS and .ME, with the operator of .RS acting as the temporary caretaker of .YU until the transition is complete, Resolved (07.77), that the .YU domain be redelegated to the Serbian National Registry of Internet Domain Names in a temporary caretaker capacity. Resolved (07.78), that the Serbian National Registry of Internet Domain Names be instructed to report their progress on decommissioning the .YU domain every six months to ICANN against a relevant set of metrics. Resolved (07.79), that the Serbian National Registry of Internet Domain Names, and the Government of Montenegro, work to complete the transition from the .YU domain to the .RS and .ME domains, so that it may be removed from the DNS root zone no later than 30 September 2009. A voice vote was taken of all Board Members present and all three motions were approved by a vote of all members present 13-0, with one abstention from Peter Dengate Thrush. Peter Dengate Thrush explained that his reservation was associated with his belief that such policy decisions concerning delegation should rest with the ccNSO as specifically provided under the bylaws. He noted that he has raised this issue on a number of occasions suggesting that this matter should be referred to the ccNSO but to no avail. The Chair noted that these practices have been in existence prior to the formation of the ccNSO, and that if policy is required in this area that the ccNSO work on a policy proposal, that might be properly considered. http://www.iana.org/reports/2007/rs-...11sep2007.html |
|
12. 06. 2009. | #8 |
Super Moderator
Knowledge base
Datum učlanjenja: 02.10.2006
Lokacija: Niš
Poruke: 1.618
Hvala: 263
275 "Hvala" u 104 poruka
|
otkud taj info?
[tnx God] |
12. 06. 2009. | #9 |
Moderator
Expert
|
|
12. 06. 2009. | #10 |
Knowledge base
Wrote a book
Datum učlanjenja: 16.06.2005
Lokacija: Novi Sad
Poruke: 1.437
Hvala: 37
131 "Hvala" u 82 poruka
|
To mi nije jasno, na samom sajtu RNIDS pise da ce .YU domeni vaziti do 30. septembra 2009?
__________________
Năo quero mais seguir um só caminho |
|
|
Slične teme | ||||
Tema | Početna poruka teme | Forum | Odgovori | Poslednja poruka |
.RS = Redovan Sex | Mr.Paja | Opušteno | 198 | 15. 07. 2009. 15:03 |
Ovaj, a baner? :-) | DejanVesic | Obaveštenja, predlozi i pitanja | 9 | 11. 09. 2006. 14:34 |